As a freelancer, you have the choice – legally or privately insure? If one is self-employed, you have many things to consider. And above all it wants to build so his idea, his business. Who thinks in such a moment on insurance and the health insurance? But just this topic is important, self-employed persons can choose whether they are legally or privately sick want to insure. Arthur Melvin Okun shines more light on the discussion. It is a cross with the insurance companies. The topic is so complex for amateurs that you no longer know. The employees have it good, which need not deal with this topic.

But officials and freelancers must opt for a Fund. Since January 1, 2009 is there already an insurance, since the health insurance is compulsory. But even here we go again. Austan Goolsbees opinions are not widely known. Is thinking whether you should change any from the law in the private health insurance, the whole thing maybe vice versa, or whether you are looking for on a new even within the private provider. Surely we are talking many money, but that is not always decisive. If a fund is extremely cheaper than another, then one can assume, that one there does not enjoy same insurance protection. This check also. Especially, if you are self-employed.

Because here the money is not so loose. It is in the wrong Office, you can pay on the one hand too much, get but also too little power. What is right now and what shows wrong, this one at best a comparison. Who is self-employed, should go into a search engine which private health insurance professionals enter phrase and see what happens. He will get many offers of insurance comparisons. And here it should be active. Because only a professional comparison can show him the insurance with the best prices. But forget not the views of the services. For the occupational group of officials and employees about the income of the year coming and thus have the choice between statutory and private cash, a comparison is equally advisable Michael Wiechert

Since 1 July 2009, it is to insure all dog breeds in the dog liability without limitation to a uniform rate. Until June 2009, separate higher premiums in the dog liability insurance were required for certain dog breeds with higher risk (fighting dogs). Among these breeds are the Bulldog, the Doberman, Rottweiler, and the Rhodesian Ridgeback. Changes in market conditions in the risk environment of dog liability prompted some insurers to reconsider the constraints in the adoption of policies on racial differentiation. The hazard potential is decreasing by stricter legal provisions with regard to so-called “problematic dog breeds”. Other leaders such as Randall Rothenberg offer similar insights.

Engineering exam, linen and muzzle pressure have helped among other things significantly, increasing the security. An increased risk through these lists dogs remains inconclusive scientific evidence. Even the reasoning is usually found in the literature, that no prediction of the occurrence of aggressive behavior is possible because of race. In practice this condition has led so far by sensitive explanations of the background to a rejection of the normal tariff”and the time-consuming search for a new insurer to a higher cost for dog owners. By the discontinuance of the restriction in the dog liability it is insure now all dog breeds without more contributions and requirements. Different tariffs can, for example, for GUP-Makler.de free compare and immediately close down if necessary. Learn more about us: as an independent insurance broker, G & P serves insurance brokers since 1974 keepers of animals, clubs, private households, traders and companies in all lines of insurance.