Kelsen shows that the Constitution did not represent Plato's law, but only the production method to rule on the basis of education. The Constitution is an educational content more than platonic legal or political. Afer is also the case dual between "good" and "wrong" Plato is a tonic to define his idea of justice as well as Kelsen points out, Plato is not recognized by the perception of the senses. The object of knowledge is beyond the senses, or is outside the scope of the dialectic experience. Created by Plato as a philosophical method to improve the Socratic project and intuition of the idea and the effort to find room for criticism about the essential nature of intuition of the idea. For more clarity and thought, follow up with gymnast and gain more knowledge.. The debate is about the dialectic between the intuitive perception and conclusive on the idea.

He was also the pioneer in the defense of objectivism. The development of a pioneer of the theory of ideas is the first design object such as a deciding factor between the two members of the training. It is difficult to disagree with the analysis concluded that there is a misconception in Kelsen in the construction of the theory of justice, Plato, the principle of equality, which is part of a first discrimination arbitrary is not rational. Thus, while legal, would not be the Platonic Republic legitimate. What Kelsen not realize is that not only the content of the substantive law of the State Constitution that would lead to the decline of the Platonic Justice, but above all, the importance indefinitely without taking into account the mechanisms of understanding in the sense giving priority to the natural possibility of rationality, which has no religious content critical.